Foundation for Taxpayer & Consumer Rights Corporateering
  Home | Volunteer | Donate | Subscribe | FTCR Websites | Books | Site Map   
Main Page
Press Releases
In the Media
Factsheets
Reports
 
 OTHER TOPICS
 - Corporate Accountability
 - Healthcare
 - Citizen Advocacy
 - The Justice System
 - Billing Errors
 - Energy
 - About FTCR

home / insurance / press releases

NEWS RELEASE
Jun 19, 1998

Court to Hear Arguments in Major 103 Lawsuits Challenging the Continued Use of Arbitrarily-Based Auto Insurance Rates

Consumer and Civil Rights Organizations Joined by Cities of Los Angeles, Oakland and San Francisco in Lawsuits Against Insurance Commissioner
An Alameda Superior Court judge will hear oral arguments on Friday that insurance companies are continuing to illegally use arbitrary factors, such as ZIP-code, gender, marital status and persistency, as major determinants in auto insurance rates, in direct contrast to voter-approved Proposition 103.

Proposition 103, approved by voters in 1988, requires that a motoristís auto insurance rates be based primarily upon three mandatory factors, in decreasing order of importance: driving safety record, annual mileage driven and years of driving experience. Insurers are then permitted to use optional factors approved through regulations by the Insurance Commissioner, but the optional factors can not have a greater impact on rates than the mandatory factors approved by the electorate.

However, Commissioner Chuck Quackenbush is allowing insurance companies to evade the rules through statistical manipulation. Consumer organizations challenged the regulation which permitted ZIP-code to be given more weight than 103's mandatory factors in hearings before the Department of Insurance last year.

But, this January, Quackenbush upheld the continued use of territory, or ZIP-code, as a primary factor in rate-setting, as well as the use of other arbitrary and discriminatory factors, such as gender, marital status and persistency (the length of time a policyholder has been with the insurer). By taking this legal action, the Project fully intends to expose the ruse that the Commissioner has perpetrated on California's beleaguered motorists.

Joining the Project in two lawsuits against the Commissioner are the cities of Los Angeles, Oakland and San Francisco, as well as other leading consumer and civil rights organizations.
  • Case No. 796082-2 Proposition 103 Enforcement Project v. Quackenbush
  • Case No. 796071-6 Spanish Speaking Citizensí Foundation v. Quackenbush

###

back to top

©2000-2004 FTCR. All Rights Reserved. Read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | Contact Us